1955 Humber Super Snipe vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 4,138 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 226 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Humber Super Snipe. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Humber Super Snipe | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Humber | Ford |
| Model | Super Snipe | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4138 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1664 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3198 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 74 L |
