1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre 4
To start off, 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,703 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 (70 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 163 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre 4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 1963 Reliant Sabre 4 | |
Make | Isuzu | Reliant |
Model | Minx | Sabre 4 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2290 mm |