1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 130 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Isuzu Minx | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Minx | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2520 mm |
