1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 1999 Kia Elan
To start off, 1999 Kia Elan is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Kia Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Kia Elan (149 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Kia Elan weights approximately 108 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 1999 Kia Elan | |
Make | Isuzu | Kia |
Model | Minx | Elan |
Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2260 mm |