1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 540 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Isuzu | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Minx | CLK |
Year Released | 1955 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2720 mm |