1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2003 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Swift is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Suzuki Swift (52 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 220 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Swift.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Isuzu Minx | 2003 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Isuzu | Suzuki |
| Model | Minx | Swift |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2270 mm |
