1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 890 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | Isuzu | SsangYong |
Model | Minx | Rexton |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2830 mm |