1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Isuzu Minx | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | Minx | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2860 mm |
