1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Isuzu I-290 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Isuzu Minx | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
| Model | Minx | I-290 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3210 mm |
