1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1955 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1955 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2880 mm |