1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 5 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1955 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | 5 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2760 mm |