1955 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Volvo S60
To start off, 2009 Volvo S60 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S60 (258 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1955 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1955 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1955 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1955 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1955 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
Model | Minx | S60 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1265 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 258 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2720 mm |