1955 Jaguar XK vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1965 Triumph 2000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Jaguar XK (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Jaguar XK weights approximately 252 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jaguar XK (285 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1955 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Jaguar XK | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | XK | 2000 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |