1955 Jaguar XK vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Jaguar XK (190 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Jaguar XK weights approximately 678 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jaguar XK (285 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1955 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Jaguar XK | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Jaguar | MCC |
Model | XK | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 1810 mm |