1955 Jaguar XK vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Jaguar XK (190 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1955 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Jaguar XK | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XK | Pixo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3441 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 68 HP |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2360 mm |