1955 Jaguar XK vs. 2010 Audi R8
To start off, 2010 Audi R8 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1955 Jaguar XK. (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1955 Jaguar XK.
Because 2010 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi R8 (429 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Jaguar XK. (285 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Jaguar XK | 2010 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Audi |
| Model | XK | R8 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3441 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 429 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1252 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 90 L |
