1955 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1955 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 1955 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Jeep CJ5 | 1952 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
Model | CJ5 | Phantom |
Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3690 mm |