1955 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1996 Mini MK VII
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VII is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1955 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 1955 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VII.
Because 1955 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mini MK VII. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1955 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Jeep CJ5 | 1996 Mini MK VII | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | CJ5 | MK VII |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6130 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2040 mm |