1955 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1955 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1955 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1955 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Smart ForTwo. (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1955 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Jeep CJ5 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Jeep | Smart |
| Model | CJ5 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 2700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1870 mm |
