1955 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1955 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1955 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 888 kg more than 1955 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (480 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | CJ5 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 480 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2774 mm |