1955 Jensen Interceptor vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Jensen Interceptor (129 HP @ 3700 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Jensen Interceptor should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Jensen Interceptor weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1955 Jensen Interceptor (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1955 Jensen Interceptor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Jensen Interceptor | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Jensen | Smart |
| Model | Interceptor | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 287 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1820 mm |
