1955 Lancia D 50 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Lancia D 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Lancia D 50 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1955 Lancia D 50. (247 HP @ 8100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Lancia D 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1116 kg more than 1955 Lancia D 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Lancia D 50 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Lancia | Cadillac |
| Model | D 50 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8100 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1756 kg |
