1955 Lotus 11 vs. 1976 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1976 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Chrysler 1609 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1955 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1955 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 712 kg more than 1955 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Lotus 11 | 1976 Chrysler 1609 | |
| Make | Lotus | Chrysler |
| Model | 11 | 1609 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1099 cc | 1639 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2670 mm |
