1955 Lotus 11 vs. 1996 Rover 800
To start off, 1996 Rover 800 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 800 (174 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1955 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 800 should accelerate faster than 1955 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 800 weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1955 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Lotus 11 | 1996 Rover 800 | |
Make | Lotus | Rover |
Model | 11 | 800 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1099 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2780 mm |