1955 Lotus 11 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Lotus 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Lotus 11 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1955 Lotus 11. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1955 Lotus 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1955 Lotus 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Lotus 11 | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 11 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1099 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2500 mm |
