1955 Maserati 150S vs. 2002 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati 150S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati 150S would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1955 Maserati 150S. (138 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati 150S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1484 kg more than 1955 Maserati 150S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Maserati 150S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1955 Maserati 150S has manual transmission. 1955 Maserati 150S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: