1955 Maserati 150S vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati 150S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati 150S would be higher. At 1,484 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Maserati 150S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Maserati 150S (138 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (98 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Maserati 150S should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 425 kg more than 1955 Maserati 150S.
Because 1955 Maserati 150S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati 150S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Maserati 150S | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | 150S | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1484 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2590 mm |