1955 Maserati 250 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati 250 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Maserati 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Maserati 250 (267 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (177 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Maserati 250 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 435 kg more than 1955 Maserati 250.
Because 1955 Maserati 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati 250 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Maserati | Renault |
| Model | 250 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 670 kg | 1105 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |
