1955 Maserati A6G vs. 1966 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1966 Maserati Mistral is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 425 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 1966 Maserati Mistral | |
| Make | Maserati | Maserati |
| Model | A6G | Mistral |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 4014 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1265 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2410 mm |
