1955 Maserati A6G vs. 1980 Volvo 164
To start off, 1980 Volvo 164 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Maserati A6G (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 164.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 1980 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | 164 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3350 mm |
