1955 Maserati A6G vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Volvo 240 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | 240 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1440 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
