1955 Maserati A6G vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (160 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 661 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | S60 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1501 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
