1955 Maserati A6G vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (218 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 354 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | S40 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1404 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
