1955 Maserati A6G vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,985 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S40 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G.
Because 1955 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1955 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1955 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | S40 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1375 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2570 mm |
