1955 Maserati A6G vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1955 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1955 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 381 kg more than 1955 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Maserati A6G | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Maserati | Chevrolet |
| Model | A6G | HHR |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1431 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2629 mm |
