1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | 190 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 64 L |
