1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 452 more horse power than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 755 kg more than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Mercedes-Benz 190 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Cadillac |
| Model | 190 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 68 L |
