1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 weights approximately 565 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2003 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 has manual transmission. 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | 220 | Minica |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2350 mm |