1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
| Model | 220 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
