1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 (83 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Because 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
Model | 220 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2360 mm |