1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 (276 HP) has 202 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 265 kg more than 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196.
Because 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Mercedes-Benz W 196 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
Model | W 196 | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 720 kg | 985 kg |