1955 MG Magnett vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1969 ZAZ 966 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 MG Magnett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 MG Magnett (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 MG Magnett should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 MG Magnett weights approximately 355 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 MG Magnett (107 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1955 MG Magnett will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 MG Magnett | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | MG | ZAZ |
| Model | Magnett | 966 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2170 mm |
