1955 MG Magnett vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 MG Magnett would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1955 MG Magnett. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 661 kg more than 1955 MG Magnett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 MG Magnett. (107 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 MG Magnett | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | MG | Cadillac |
| Model | Magnett | CTS |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2880 mm |
