1955 MG Magnett vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 MG Magnett would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 MG Magnett is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Smart Fortwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1955 MG Magnett. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Smart Fortwo should accelerate faster than 1955 MG Magnett.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 MG Magnett. (107 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 MG Magnett. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1955 MG Magnett has manual transmission. 1955 MG Magnett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 MG Magnett | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | MG | Smart |
Model | Magnett | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1955 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |