1955 Morris Minor vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Morris Minor would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1955 Morris Minor. (30 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1955 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 315 kg more than 1955 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Morris Minor | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Morris | Sunbeam |
Model | Minor | Tiger |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 803 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 22 L | 27 L |