1955 Opel Rekord vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1955 Opel Rekord. (44 HP @ 3900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1955 Opel Rekord.
Because 1955 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Opel Rekord | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Opel | Volkswagen |
| Model | Rekord | Polo |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1420 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
