1955 Packard Patrician vs. 1997 Ford F-150

To start off, 1997 Ford F-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-150.

Because 1997 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Packard Patrician. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Packard Patrician 1997 Ford F-150
Make Packard Ford
Model Patrician F-150
Year Released 1955 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5767 cc 4194 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 271 HP 202 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Length 5530 mm 5230 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 2000 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 3240 mm 3050 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]