1955 Packard Patrician vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2003 Renault Scenic II is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Because 1955 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Scenic II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Packard Patrician | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | Packard | Renault |
Model | Patrician | Scenic II |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5767 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3240 mm | 2750 mm |