1955 Packard Patrician vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Patrician. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Patrician would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Patrician is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Packard Patrician (271 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Rogue. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Packard Patrician should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Rogue.
Because 1955 Packard Patrician is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Packard Patrician. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Packard Patrician | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Packard | Nissan |
| Model | Patrician | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5767 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3240 mm | 2690 mm |
