1955 Peugeot 203 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1955 Peugeot 203. (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1955 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 180 kg more than 1955 Peugeot 203. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (191 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Peugeot 203. (80 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Peugeot 203.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Peugeot 203 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 203 | Clio |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 80 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |